OPINION - AB 1613 - PROCESS MATTERS AS MUCH AS THE PRODUCT

 

OPINION

 By Don Amador, President

Quiet Warrior Racing LLC

August 7, 2026

 

AB 1613 - Why Process Matters as Much as the Product

 

Over the past 35 years, I have been fortunate to participate in numerous collaborative efforts involving recreation organizations, conservation groups, industry representatives, local governments, state and federal agencies, tribal governments, and elected officials. Some of those efforts have produced lasting successes, while others have struggled to achieve their intended goals. Throughout that journey, I have learned one lesson that continues to shape my view of public policy: people are generally willing to support difficult decisions—even decisions they may not completely agree with—if they believe the process was fair, transparent, and respectful of everyone's contributions.

 

That lesson has been on my mind as California continued its discussion of Assembly Bill 1613, the proposal to establish a statewide Off-Highway Vehicle Safety and Stewardship Program, at the August 6 OHMVR Commission meeting at Kings Beach, CA.

 

CALSPAN VIDEO OF COMMISSION MEETING

https://cal-span.org/meeting/ohmvr_20260806/

 

Before anyone misunderstands my perspective, let me be perfectly clear. I support improving OHV safety. I support rider education. I support responsible recreation and stewardship. In fact, I have spent much of my professional career working toward those very goals. The question before us has never been whether California should improve safety. The real question is whether the process used to reach that goal honors the collaborative work that made the idea possible in the first place.

 

For four years, California State Parks convened annual OHV Safety Summits that brought together an impressive cross-section of the OHV community. Recreation organizations, conservation interests, law enforcement, federal land managers, OHMVR commissioners, volunteer non-profits, local governments, rider training providers, and State Parks staff all came to the table. Many of us invested hundreds of hours discussing safety trends, identifying emerging challenges, and searching for practical solutions that could improve rider safety while preserving recreational opportunities. Those meetings were not always easy. There were disagreements, spirited debates, and difficult compromises. But that is precisely what meaningful collaboration looks like.

 

Over time, common ground began to emerge. We were not simply concepts of creating an online OHV safety education program; we were building relationships and developing trust. That trust became every bit as valuable as the recommendations themselves.

 

Today, much of the frustration expressed at the commission meeting concerning AB 1613 does not appear to stem from opposition to safety education. Rather, it comes from the perception among many participants that the collaboratively developed work product was not fully reflected in the legislation that ultimately advanced through the Capitol. Whether everyone agrees with that perception is almost beside the point. The perception itself has become a significant issue because collaboration depends as much on confidence in the process as it does on the final outcome.

 

One irony has not been lost on many stakeholders. The current version of AB 1613 calls for the creation of yet another stakeholder process to develop the details of the new safety program. That raises an understandable question. If participants believe the recommendations from one four-year collaborative effort were not fully carried forward, what confidence will they have that a future stakeholder process will produce a different result? That question extends well beyond this bill. It speaks to the credibility of other state-led collaborative governance model.

 

My perspective on this issue has also been shaped by experiences where collaboration worked exceptionally well. One of the best examples is FireScape Mendocino, where I have served as a Co-Founder and Core Team member. FireScape brought together the U.S. Forest Service, CAL FIRE, conservation organizations, county governments, private landowners, scientists, and community leaders to address forest health and wildfire resilience. We certainly did not agree on every issue, but participants trusted the process. Ideas were openly debated, recommendations were refined together, and everyone understood that their contributions mattered. That trust allowed FireScape Mendocino to become a nationally recognized example of collaborative conservation.

 

Yesterday's California OHMVR Commission meeting illustrated why this issue deserves careful consideration. The public testimony reflected genuine concern from several long-time OHV leaders regarding the current direction of AB 1613. Interestingly, none of the speakers argued against improving OHV safety. Instead, the discussion focused on stakeholder engagement, legislative intent, governance, implementation, and preserving the integrity of the collaborative process that had taken place over the previous four years. The Commission recognized that these concerns warranted additional discussion and requested that State Parks provide a future report to help clarify the issues. That was an encouraging step because healthy organizations ask difficult questions, and effective collaborative programs welcome those conversations.

 

One concern that particularly resonates with me is the potential long-term effect this experience could have on future stakeholder processes. California increasingly relies on collaborative groups to address complex issues involving recreation, forest management, wildfire resilience, watershed restoration, wildlife conservation, and public land management. These collaborations succeed because people often volunteer their time with the expectation that their knowledge, experience, and recommendations will receive meaningful consideration. If participants begin to believe that years of collaborative work can simply be set aside without explanation, it becomes much harder to convince experienced stakeholders to invest their time in future public processes.

 

I remain optimistic that California can develop an outstanding Off-Highway Vehicle Safety and Stewardship Program. The objective is worthwhile, and I believe there is broad agreement within the OHV community that education and stewardship should continue to be strengthened. But I also believe we have an opportunity—and perhaps an obligation—to ensure that the final legislation reflects the collaborative spirit that originally inspired the effort.

 

As someone who has spent much of his career working around collaborative tables, I hope California chooses the path that strengthens, rather than weakens, confidence in stakeholder engagement. Good public policy is rarely built by the loudest voices or the quickest victories. It is built through respectful dialogue, careful listening, thoughtful compromise, and mutual trust.

 

In the end, the true measure of a successful collaborative process is not simply the policy or legislation it produces. It is whether the people who devoted countless hours to building consensus are willing to return to the table the next time they are invited.

 

That may ultimately be the most important lesson of all.

 

# # #

Don Amador has been in the trail advocacy, post wildfire recovery and recreation management profession for 35 years.  Don is Past President/CEO and current board member of the Post Wildfire OHV Recovery Alliance.  Don is a Co-Founder of FireScape Mendocino, a forest health collaborative that is part of the National Fire Learning Network.  Don served as Chairman of the CA State Parks Off-Highway Vehicle Commission (circa 1994-2000). Don served as an AD Driver for the Forest Service North Zone Fire Cache during the 2022, 2023, and 2024 Fire Seasons.   

MEDIA AND STAKEHOLDER ADVISORY - QWR SUBMITS COMMENTS AND REPORT ON NOAA REVIEW OF CA COASTAL COMMISSION

MEDIA ADVISORY

 FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE

 August 5, 2026

 

Quiet Warrior Racing Releases New Policy Report for NOAA's Review of California Coastal Management Program

 

NOTE: Public Invited to Submit Comments by August 22 Deadline

 

Cottonwood, California — Quiet Warrior Racing LLC (QWR) announced today that it has formally submitted comments to the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA) as part of the agency's Section 312 Performance Evaluation of the California Coastal Management Program.

 

As part of its submission, QWR transmitted Policy Report No. 2026-1, “California's Coastal Management Program at Fifty: A Policy Review of Recreation, Public Access, Adaptive Management, and the Implementation of the California Coastal Act and Federal Coastal Zone Management Act.”

 

The report examines nearly five decades of California coastal management policy, reviewing the historical evolution of recreation, public access, conservation, adaptive management, and implementation of the California Coastal Act and the Federal Coastal Zone Management Act.

 

"Our report recognizes California's remarkable conservation accomplishments while asking an important public policy question," said Don Amador, President of Quiet Warrior Racing. "Has implementation of the Coastal Act continued to reflect the Legislature's original vision of balancing environmental stewardship with public access, recreation, coordinated planning, and the social and economic needs of Californians?"

 

Unlike many public comments focused on a single issue, the QWR report provides a broader historical perspective on California's coastal management program. It documents the significant reduction in legal coastal motorized recreation opportunities over the past fifty years while also highlighting successful examples of adaptive management, including Oceano Dunes State Vehicular Recreation Area and the Bureau of Land Management's Samoa Dunes Recreation Area.

 

OHMVR Commission Meeting

 

The California Off-Highway Motor Vehicle Recreation Commission meets August 6 in North Lake Tahoe. While the QWR report is not a formal agenda item, NOAA's ongoing evaluation of California's Coastal Management Program and the future of coastal recreation are expected to be topics of interest during Commission related public testimony and discussions.

 

Public Comment Opportunity

 

NOAA's evaluation provides an opportunity for all Californians—not just organized stakeholder groups—to participate in reviewing the implementation of California's federally approved Coastal Management Program.

 

QWR encourages recreation enthusiasts, local governments, businesses, conservation organizations, Tribal governments, and interested citizens to submit respectful, constructive, and fact-based comments describing their experiences and perspectives.

 

Comments may address topics such as:

 

·         Public access to California's coast.

·         Outdoor recreation opportunities.

·         Adaptive management and collaborative stewardship.

·         Coastal conservation.

·         Local community impacts.

·         Implementation of the California Coastal Act.

 

Public comments must be received by NOAA no later than August 22, 2026.

 

QWR COMMENT LETTER

https://ohv.parks.ca.gov/pages/1140/files/QWR%20Report%202026-1%20NOAA%20Comment%20letter%20updated.pdf

 

COPY OF QWR REPORT 2026-1

https://ohv.parks.ca.gov/pages/1140/files/QWR%20Policy%20Report%20No.%202026-1.pdf

 

# # #

Quiet Warrior Racing LLC is a California-based public lands consulting and communications firm specializing in off-highway vehicle recreation, sustainable trail management, post-wildfire recovery, forest stewardship, and collaborative public land policy. Through research, education, and stakeholder engagement, QWR works to promote responsible recreation while supporting the long-term conservation of America's public lands.

 

BEYOND THE CHAINSAW DEBATE: FINDING COMMON GROUND ON STEWARDSHIP OF AMERICA'S WILDERNESS

BEYOND THE CHAINSAW DEBATE: FINDING COMMON GROUND ON STEWARDSHIP OF AMERICA’S WILDERNESS

OPINION

By Don Amador

7/29/26

  

A recent High Country News article titled, “A Ban on Chainsaws in Wilderness is Performative, Not Practical" has sparked renewed discussion about one of the most sensitive issues in public land management. While the article focuses on whether chainsaws should be used to clear trails in designated Wilderness Areas following the unprecedented destruction caused by Western megafires, I believe the larger story is not about chainsaws at all. It is about finding common ground on stewardship of designated Wilderness areas. 

 

For decades, wilderness stewardship has been guided by principles established in the Wilderness Act of 1964, a landmark law that has served our nation well by protecting some of America's most treasured landscapes. At the time, few could have imagined the scale of the ecological changes that would occur during the first quarter of the 21st century. Today, millions of acres of federal forests have experienced repeated high-severity wildfires, widespread insect infestations, prolonged drought, and extensive tree mortality. Across much of the West, trails that once connected visitors to remote landscapes are now buried beneath thousands of fallen trees or surrounded by hazardous stands of dead timber.

 

These conditions have created management challenges unlike anything previous generations of land managers encountered. The question is no longer simply whether trail crews should use crosscut saws or chainsaws. The more important question is whether our current management framework is keeping pace with the realities on the ground.

 

Fortunately, this is not a new challenge for public land management. Throughout my career, I have watched federal and state agencies, conservation organizations, recreation groups, local governments, industry representatives, scientists, and volunteers come together to solve difficult resource issues that once seemed impossible to overcome. Collaborative efforts addressing post-fire recovery, watershed restoration, sustainable trail management, forest health, invasive species, wildlife habitat, and outdoor recreation have repeatedly demonstrated that the best solutions rarely emerge from one stakeholder acting alone.

 

That same collaborative model should now be applied to the growing challenge of maintaining access and stewardship within our National Wilderness Preservation System.

 

Unfortunately, much of the current discussion appears to be occurring within isolated circles rather than through an open, transparent collaborative process. Some conversations are taking place within the Forest Service. Others involve wilderness advocacy organizations, outfitters, volunteer trail groups, or local communities. Yet there has been little evidence of a broad national dialogue that intentionally brings together the full range of interests that care deeply about America's wilderness.

 

The Forest Service has not adopted a nationwide policy authorizing chainsaw use in Wilderness, nor should anyone expect such a significant policy question to be resolved through isolated project decisions. Instead, the agency continues to evaluate requests under the long-established "minimum requirements" process authorized by the Wilderness Act. While that approach provides flexibility on a case-by-case basis, it does little to answer the larger question facing land managers across the West: How should wilderness stewardship evolve as our forests continue to change?

 

  

A collaborative forum would allow participants to move beyond the emotionally charged question of "chainsaws versus crosscut saws" and instead examine broader issues such as post-fire forest conditions, trail sustainability, volunteer capacity, workforce limitations, visitor safety, ecological impacts, and long-term stewardship objectives. Rather than debating a single tool, stakeholders could focus on identifying management strategies capable of preserving both wilderness character and meaningful public access for future generations.

 

Decisions developed through open dialogue are far more likely to gain public acceptance than policies developed behind closed doors or through litigation. Even when consensus cannot be achieved, participants gain a better understanding of one another's perspectives and often discover common ground that would otherwise remain hidden.

 

This issue also offers an opportunity for the Forest Service to demonstrate leadership. The agency has decades of experience participating in collaborative partnerships throughout the West. Applying that same collaborative model to wilderness trail management could help establish a thoughtful path forward that respects both the intent of the Wilderness Act and the unprecedented conditions facing today's land managers.

 

None of us knows what the final answer will be. It may involve increased funding for traditional trail crews, expanded volunteer training, improved post-fire restoration strategies, additional research, carefully limited administrative flexibility, or perhaps entirely new approaches that have yet to be considered. Those solutions should emerge from collaboration rather than confrontation.

 

Massive wildfires in the American West have changed many forested lands dramatically over the past fifteen to 20 years. Rather than asking whether chainsaws belong in Wilderness, perhaps the more important question is this: Can we bring together the people who care most about these remarkable places and work collaboratively to ensure they remain healthy, accessible, and resilient for generations to come? - That is a conversation worth having.

 

# # #

 

Don Amador has been in the trail advocacy, post wildfire recovery, and recreation management profession for 35 years.  Don served as Chair of the CA State Parks Off-Highway Vehicle Recreation Commission (circa 1994-2000). Don served as an AD Driver for the Forest Service North Zone Fire Cache during the 2022, 2023, and 2024 Fire Seasons.   

OPINION - USDA SERVICE CENTERS - NEW FACE OF THE FOREST SERVICE?

USDA SERVICE CENTER - REDDING, CA
 

OPINION

By Don Amador

7/23/2026

 

When I recently visited the new USDA Service Center in Redding, California, I found myself reflecting on just how much the U.S. Forest Service has evolved over the past century.

Located in what many longtime Northern California residents still think of as the Shasta-Trinity National Forest Supervisor's Office, the building today serves a much broader purpose. Along with the headquarters for the Shasta-Trinity National Forest, it houses the Pacific Southwest Research Station, the Natural Resources Conservation Service (NRCS), Farm Service Agency (FSA), Rural Development, and other USDA programs under one roof.

Rather than serving as the headquarters of a single National Forest, these facilities function as integrated USDA campuses where multiple agencies work side by side. The emphasis is less on organizational boundaries and more on delivering a range of services to rural communities, landowners, agricultural producers, conservation partners, researchers, and public land users.

It is a noticeable evolution from an agency structure rooted in the 1930s toward a model that better reflects twenty-first century technology, community engagement, and collaboration.

 

Forest health projects today rarely involve just one agency. Restoring watersheds, reducing hazardous fuels, improving wildlife habitat, supporting grazing operations, and expanding recreation opportunities often require expertise from several USDA agencies working together with state agencies, timber companies, counties, tribes, local governments, conservation organizations, and recreation groups.

 

For recreation organizations, Fire Safe Councils, Resource Conservation Districts, and county governments, having multiple decision-makers available in one location can simplify coordination on projects that benefit both public lands and surrounding communities.

 

For someone seeking information on conservation programs, grazing permits, forest management, recreation opportunities, or wildfire recovery, having several USDA agencies under one roof can eliminate multiple trips across town.

 

Older Forest Service Supervisor's Offices often possessed a distinct personality. Visitors walked into buildings that reflected the history and character of a particular National Forest. Large wall maps, timber displays, historic photographs, Smokey Bear exhibits, and recreation information reminded visitors they were entering the headquarters of a specific forest.

 

As someone who has spent much of my career working alongside Forest Service professionals, I believe one challenge deserves continued attention.

 

Outdoor recreation—including hiking, hunting, fishing, horseback riding, mountain biking, camping, and off-highway vehicle recreation—is now one of the largest and fastest-growing uses of our National Forest System. Service Centers should continue evolving to reflect that reality.

 

Imagine visitor lobbies featuring interactive recreation maps, trail condition displays, wildfire recovery information, volunteer opportunities, America the Beautiful pass information, and exhibits celebrating the many ways people enjoy their National Forests.

 

As these Service Centers continue to develop across the country, the opportunity will be to preserve the proud heritage and local identity of our National Forests while embracing a more modern, collaborative way of serving the American public.

 

For those of us in the outdoor recreation community, that's an evolution worth supporting—and helping to shape.

 

# # #

 

Don Amador has been in the trail advocacy, recreation management, and wildfire recovery profession for 35 years and served as chairman of the CA State Parks Off-Highway Motor Vehicle Recreation Commission.    

BEARS EARS NATIONAL MONUMENT - BEYOND THE HEADLINES

 

OPINION

By Don Amador

July 15, 2026

 *Permission is hereby granted to repost

 

BEARS EARS NATIONAL MONUMENT – BEYOND THE HEADLINES 

 

President Trump's recent Executive Order modifying the boundaries of the Bears Ears National Monument has reignited a familiar debate across the West. Depending on which headlines or social media posts you read, the action is either being celebrated as a major victory for public access or condemned as an unprecedented attack on conservation and Tribal interests. As is often the case with public land issues, the reality is considerably more complex.

 

After reviewing the Executive Order, the recently approved Bears Ears Resource Management Plan, and the initial reactions from recreation, conservation, and Tribal organizations, I believe there is value in stepping back from the political rhetoric to look at what the Order actually does—and just as importantly—what it does not do.

 

For the off-highway vehicle community, the Executive Order does not immediately reopen trails or create new riding opportunities. It reduces the monument boundaries and restores those lands to traditional Bureau of Land Management (BLM) and U.S. Forest Service multiple-use management. Existing travel management decisions, designated route systems, and resource management plans generally remain in place until they are modified through future planning processes. In other words, this is not an "opening" of public lands. It is the beginning of another planning process.

 

That distinction is important. Future decisions regarding motorized recreation will still require compliance with the Federal Land Policy and Management Act (FLPMA), the National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA), the National Historic Preservation Act, the Endangered Species Act, and other applicable federal laws. Public involvement, environmental analysis, and collaboration among stakeholders will remain essential components of any future travel management decisions.

 

For those of us who have spent decades working on travel management plans throughout the West, this is familiar territory. Executive Orders can establish policy direction, but they do not replace the detailed work of inventorying routes, evaluating resource conditions, balancing competing uses, and engaging the public in developing sustainable travel management plans.

 

Ironically, one fact that received relatively little attention during the previous Bears Ears planning effort was that the Bureau of Land Management estimated that approximately 98 percent of previously designated motorized routes would remain available for public use, even under the recently approved monument management plan.  While many in the OHV community understandably focused on the proposed closures, the broader story was that the vast majority of designated routes remained open. That illustrates how public perception and the actual details of land management decisions are not always the same.

 

From my perspective, however, the most significant issue is not the number of miles that may eventually open or close. It is the continuing instability in public land management.

 

Bears Ears has now experienced multiple major policy reversals under successive presidential administrations. Each change has required agencies to begin new planning efforts, redirect limited staff resources, revisit previous decisions, and prepare for the inevitable legal challenges. Local communities, Tribes, counties, recreation groups, conservation organizations, and agency personnel are once again left wondering what the next administration may decide.

 

Throughout my career, I have learned that durable public land management is rarely achieved through political victories alone. It is built through collaboration.

 

One of the reasons I publicly supported the expansion of California's Berryessa Snow Mountain National Monument was because the process brought together Tribes, conservation organizations, local governments, and the OHV community in meaningful discussions about the future of those public lands. Designated motorized recreation remained part of the conversation, not because everyone agreed on every issue, but because participants were willing to work toward practical solutions that balanced conservation with public access. 

 

My impression has been that the Bears Ears process never achieved that same level of trust among all interested stakeholders. Whether that perception is entirely accurate is almost beside the point; rebuilding trust should now become a priority regardless of one's position on the Executive Order.

 

The motorized recreation community also has an opportunity to demonstrate leadership. Rather than viewing this Executive Order solely as a political victory, we should continue advocating for what has consistently produced successful outcomes across the West: sustainable recreation on designated routes, protection of archaeological and cultural resources, respect for Tribal history and traditions, science-based travel management, and meaningful collaboration with other public land interests.

 

Likewise, the conservation community has an opportunity to recognize that many responsible OHV organizations have spent decades promoting route designation, resource protection, volunteer stewardship, restoration projects, wildfire recovery, and partnerships with public land managers. Managed motorized recreation and conservation are not mutually exclusive. In many places across the West, they have become complementary objectives supported by strong local partnerships.

 

The greatest challenge facing public lands today is not simply deciding where people can ride, hike, hunt, mountain bike, or camp. It is developing management strategies that can endure beyond the next election cycle. Constant policy reversals consume agency resources, discourage stakeholder investment, and make it increasingly difficult to build the trust necessary for successful long-term stewardship.

 

Whether one supports or opposes President Trump's Executive Order, we should all recognize that the future of Bears Ears—and countless other public lands—will ultimately be determined not by headlines or executive actions alone, but by the quality of the planning and collaboration that follows.

 

For those of us who care deeply about America's public lands, that should remain the common ground.

 

# # #

 

Don Amador is a longtime public lands advocate with over 34 years of experience in recreation policy, trail stewardship, and collaborative land management and former Chair of the CA State Parks OHMVR Commission

SPIRIT OF 1776 - THE POWER OF THE SPOKEN WORD

 SPIRIT OF 1776 - The Power of the Spoken Word

By Don Amador

July 6, 2026

 

A few weeks ago, a noted political historian in Sacramento encouraged me to do something I had never considered before. On the morning of July 4, he suggested that I stand on the front porch of our ranch home, nestled among the oak woodlands west of Cottonwood, California, and read the Declaration of Independence aloud—in a strong, clear voice—to anyone gathered to hear it.

 

In my case, the audience consisted of my wife, Ellen, and our faithful dog, Sadie.

 

He also suggested that, in some small way, I might be joining what he hoped would become a nationwide "town crier" tradition as part of America's 250th anniversary celebration.

 

Having read the Declaration of Independence many times over the years—but never aloud—I thought it was an excellent idea. As Independence Day approached, I practiced reading it throughout the house. With each rehearsal, I found myself increasingly moved by its language and sensed that this would be more than simply reading a historic document.

 

Still, nothing prepared me for what happened when I stepped onto the porch and began speaking those words.

 

Almost immediately, I was struck by the monumental weight of the Declaration. Reading it aloud gave new life to its carefully crafted arguments and the long list of legitimate grievances against the tyranny and injustices imposed by the British Crown. The words no longer felt like history preserved on a page. They became a living testimony to courage, conviction, sacrifice, and an unyielding belief that liberty was worth every risk.

 

I also found myself overwhelmed with admiration for the fifty-six men who pledged "their Lives, their Fortunes and their sacred Honor" by signing that remarkable document. They fully understood the consequences of their actions, yet they signed anyway, believing future generations deserved the opportunity to live in freedom.

 

As someone who has spent much of my life speaking before audiences, I was genuinely surprised by my emotional reaction. Speaking the Declaration aloud gave me a far deeper appreciation for its gravity, its timeless message, and its enduring influence—not only on the birth of the United States, but on the cause of liberty around the world.

 

From this day forward, I intend to read the Declaration of Independence aloud every Fourth of July. It is my personal way of honoring our Founders, their families, and the generations of American service members who have sacrificed over the past 250 years to preserve the freedoms we enjoy today.

 

Perhaps more importantly, it serves as a reminder that freedom is never self-sustaining. Every generation has a responsibility to understand it, defend it, and pass it on.

 

This Independence Day, I encourage others to try the same simple exercise. Gather your family, your friends, or even just yourself. Stand on your porch, in your backyard, or in a local park, and read the Declaration of Independence out loud.  You may discover, as I did, that some words are meant not only to be read—but to be heard.

 

## #

 

Don Amador is a longtime public lands advocate with over 34 years of experience in recreation policy, trail stewardship, and collaborative land management and former Chair of the CA State Parks OHMVR Commission

QWR - Happy 250th Birthday, America!

 

Happy 250th Birthday, America!

As our nation celebrates 250 years of freedom, all of us at Quiet Warrior Racing (QWR) are reminded just how fortunate we are to live in a country blessed with extraordinary public lands and the freedom to explore them.

From the rugged mountain trails of our National Forests to the wide-open deserts managed by the Bureau of Land Management, and from world-class State Vehicular Recreation Areas to countless state parks across America, we enjoy some of the finest off-highway vehicle recreation opportunities anywhere in the world. These places don't exist by accident. They are the result of generations of dedicated public servants, land managers, volunteers, recreation advocates, and responsible riders working together to conserve access while protecting the natural resources we all cherish.

As we celebrate America's 250th birthday, we also pause to remember that the freedoms we enjoy today were envisioned by our Founding Fathers and have been preserved through the courage and sacrifice of the men and women of our Armed Forces. Their service has protected not only our nation, but also the liberties that allow us to gather with family and friends, explore the outdoors, and pass our love of recreation on to future generations.

This Independence Day, whether you're riding a favorite trail, camping beneath the stars, or spending time with those you love, take a moment to appreciate the incredible privilege of living in this great nation.

From all of us at Quiet Warrior Racing, thank you for doing your part to ride responsibly, care for our public lands, and support the partnerships that keep quality OHV recreation available across America.

Happy 250th Birthday, America! God bless our public lands, our Armed Forces, and the United States of America.

# ##